Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131030
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	May 03 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3220-$36 19,337 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 73 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 140 58% 97.7 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 155 17% 136 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Palit(1569 1380) 2GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 21 19% 20.7 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 17.8 18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 82 86 78 69 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 447 Write 396 Mixed 283 SusWrite 98 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 49.2 176% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 171 178% 293 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 395GB free Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 212 226 225 232 231 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	80.9% Excellent	Read 240 Write 228 Mixed 240 SusWrite 215 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 47.5 158% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 179 140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 549 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.1% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 9 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	198x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	131x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	78x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16