Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 01:18
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 301
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,183
105% 892 Pts
64-Core 1,153
71% 1,153 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,566
Write 2,176
Mixed 1,668
474% 2,137 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 86.7
283% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,498
DQ Write 1,364
DQ Mixed 1,427
1,071% 1,429 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2233 2247 1161 1152 1142 1151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,537
Write 2,351
Mixed 1,456
SusWrite 1,514
440% 1,965 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 83
272% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,683
DQ Write 1,542
DQ Mixed 1,596
1,202% 1607 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 350%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
153GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 488 481 487 487 489 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 461
Mixed 346
SusWrite 486
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 45.6
152% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 347
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 169 169 169 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 158
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 168
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
765GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 186 187 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 158
Mixed 106
SusWrite 186
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 33.9
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 31.1
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,066
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback