Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 01:06
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,190
106% 895 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,590
Write 2,253
Mixed 1467
466% 2,104 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 86
282% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 1,361
DQ Mixed 1,426
1,074% 1,437 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2409 2160 1136 1150 1142 1139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,510
Write 2,181
Mixed 1,412
SusWrite 1,523
427% 1,906 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 83.3
273% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,651
DQ Write 1,537
DQ Mixed 1,591
1,195% 1,593 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 349%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
153GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 478 476 479 484 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 486
Mixed 357
SusWrite 482
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 45.6
163% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 344
262% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 167 168 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 99.2
Mixed 88
SusWrite 168
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
765GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 185 186 185 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 118
Mixed 110
SusWrite 186
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 34
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 30.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,066
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback