Asrock X470 Master SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Master SLI  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 07:58
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,145
103% 866 Pts
64-Core 2,128
132% 2,128 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
Nvidia(10DE 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 17.3
18% 17.8 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 19.8
16% 20 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN06SM19EG1TBM2IT 1TB
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0408B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 354 5.4 6 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 498
Write 426
Mixed 384
SusWrite 133
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 32.4
141% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 49.2
84% 159 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 90%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
18GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 468
Mixed 358
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 37.9
137% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 136
140% 231 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 145 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 144
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95
330GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 104
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 107%
External USB3.0 DISK00 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 138 138 138 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 135
Write 104
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 137
153% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK01 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 138 138 138 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 168
Write 141
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 137
176% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 32
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 28.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Master SLI Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Master SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback