HP h8-1360t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP h8-1360t (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120702
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '20 at 03:37
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 105 2-Core 202 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 508 51% 416 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874B) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.4% Above average	Lighting 77.7 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 68.5 63% 70.3 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 54.8 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 78 89 93 95 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	47% Average	Read 80.2 Write 77.6 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 83.6 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 141% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 69%
Samsung UHD Video Pack 1TB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 421GB free, PID 62c8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 22.3 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 25.2 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFW0-GN-F EBJ40UG8EFW0-GN-F 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1360t Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1360t

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	109x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	19x
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	14x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	8x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	5x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	9x
EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 54%, 1,026 samples	6x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $385

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16