Lenovo 20B7T44052

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20B7T44052  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20B7T44052
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 20:58
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 129
57% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 187
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 59.9
4% 59.9 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4380
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 4.81
2% 4.18 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 2
Splatting 5.83
4% 4.85 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U110 16GB
9GB free
Firmware: U21B001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 201
Write 46
Mixed 57
SusWrite 48.8
19% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 7.9
29% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 12.9
11% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 28%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS2ZC360
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 60 65 65 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 81.7
Write 93
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 62.4
47% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT851S6AMR6A-PB Kingston 9905428-123.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback