Microelectronics G434

Performance Results


Gaming 169% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 163% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Microelectronics G434 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '20 at 15:46
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$275 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 95.9 1-Core 151 2-Core 300 100% 182 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 1,177 105% 887 Pts	64-Core 1189 74% 1189 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	164% Outstanding	Lighting 230 Reflection 240 Parallax 239 188% 236 fps	MRender 265 Gravity 221 Splatting 143 164% 210 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 174%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 502GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 726 827 841 711 687 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 1,546 Write 1,535 Mixed 1,283 SusWrite 790 289% 1,288 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 36.7 127% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,569 DQ Write 1,247 DQ Mixed 1,147 929% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 276%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 32,191 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	96.7% Outstanding	MC Read 43.1 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 28.8 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 32.9 SC Mixed 30.2 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G434 Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 106%

UFO

System: Microelectronics G434

CPU
Core i7-9700KFIntel $218Bench 97%, 32,736 samples	192x
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	56x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	190x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	11x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	8x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	138x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	74x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $149Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	8x

RAM
NMUD416E82-3600 2x16GBUnknownBench 93%, 785 samples	153x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	32x
NMUD480E82-3600 4x8GBUnknownBench 106%, 66 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $502

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16