Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 05:04
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 1,171
99% 851 Pts
64-Core 2,164
134% 2,164 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 118
Parallax 99.8
92% 110 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 103
Splatting 101
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2025 1739 1746 1750 1747 1750 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 2,304
Mixed 1,863
SusWrite 1,793
451% 1,998 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 77.9
270% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,195
887% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 326%
Great: 347%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
762GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 473 473 474 474 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 454
Mixed 439
SusWrite 473
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.1
186% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 308
250% 354 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 111 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 140
Write 149
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 109
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
222% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 45.2
134% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 40.2
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback