Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 18:44
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,135
100% 849 Pts
64-Core 2,139
132% 2,139 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 126
Parallax 117
97% 121 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 110
Splatting 111
89% 108 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 1744 1745 1741 1741 1740 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,029
Write 2265
Mixed 1,853
SusWrite 1,789
448% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 75.9
261% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 1,095
823% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 320%
Great: 347%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
762GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 473 473 473 471 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 473
Mixed 425
SusWrite 472
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.4
182% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 305
248% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 123%
Great: 125%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 111 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 147
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 109
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
222% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 45.1
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback