Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1129
100% 848 Pts
64-Core 2033
126% 2033 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2011 1741 1736 1740 1742 1744 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2016
Write 2,253
Mixed 1,856
SusWrite 1,786
446% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 74.7
258% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,132
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 1,040
784% 1,051 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 316%
Great: 347%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
762GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 472 473 472 471 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 473
Mixed 429
SusWrite 472
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 53.1
178% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 310
250% 353 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 121%
Great: 125%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 110 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 109
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
233% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 45
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 39.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback