Acer Veriton M4610G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton M4610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4610G
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 14:28
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 173
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 323
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.6% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 81.4
49% 68.6 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 53.8
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 77 53 53 55 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 438
Write 283
Mixed 136
SusWrite 57.5
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 28.4
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 53.5
DQ Mixed 71.4
61% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
475GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 120 120 121 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 120
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG Kingston 99U5474-012.A00LF Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4610G Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback