Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory187.5 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 02:31
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6244
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,103
98% 828 Pts
64-Core 2,667
165% 2,667 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64ASTMM0000A 64GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 420
Write 75.1
Mixed 123
SusWrite 74.7
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 34.9
127% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 85.4
70% 102 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer AQD-D4U16R26-SE 12x16GB
12 of 24 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
182% Outstanding
MC Read 67.9
MC Write 85.3
MC Mixed 80.7
223% 78 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 182%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback