Asus X540LJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X540LJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540LJ
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160314
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 16:38
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 154
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 216
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 10D0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 6.69
4% 6.4 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 5
Splatting 11.1
7% 7.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 358 414 398 403 406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 395
Mixed 326
SusWrite 393
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 35.7
134% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 168
160% 245 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 93%
Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 3.7 7.2 8.4 4.9 6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 25.6
Write 25.6
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 6.4
20% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P2 Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X540LJ Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540LJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback