bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100407
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 02:30
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 109
50% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.16
4% 4.28 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 480GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 221
Write 210
Mixed 188
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 22.6
76% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 34.8
31% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 99%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
10GB free
Firmware: 0309
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 124
Write 109
Mixed 112
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 13.3
55% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 54
DQ Mixed 17
19% 31 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
351GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,866
Write 22
Mixed 44
462% 644 MB/s
4K Read 198
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
8,284% 66.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
167GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 77.7
Mixed 63.5
60% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RM25664BA1339.16SF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback