bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 00:48
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 142
56% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 172
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.16
4% 4.24 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 480GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 212
Write 195
Mixed 186
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 21.6
74% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 34
30% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 99%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
10GB free
Firmware: 0309
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 118
Write 106
Mixed 112
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 13
54% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 16.9
19% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
351GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,268
Write 24.7
Mixed 40.2
557% 778 MB/s
4K Read 302
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0
12,602% 101 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
167GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.7
Write 96.7
Mixed 62.5
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RM25664BA1339.16SF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback