bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 06:18
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 123
54% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 60
16% 107 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 4.16
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 480GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 189 193 123 136 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 206
Write 192
Mixed 180
SusWrite 165
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 20.2
68% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 35.1
31% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 99%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
10GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 143 138 86 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 221
Write 163
Mixed 162
SusWrite 118
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 15.1
64% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 17.5
23% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
351GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 6.5 8.7 18 6.1 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
167GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 43 41 71 62 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 100
Write 46.8
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 53.8
49% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RM25664BA1339.16SF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback