Fujitsu ESPRIMO E710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 22:58
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 175
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 453
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 61 53 32 100 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 8.5
Write 20.2
Mixed 14.6
SusWrite 53.9
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
338GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 72 70 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 70.5
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 9905584-017.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E710 Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback