Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 01:45
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 624
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 87.6
86% 96.3 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 92.8
Splatting 82.7
76% 94.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.6.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 238
Write 125
Mixed 112
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 32.2
122% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 81.7
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 65.6
60% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 80%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
72GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 518 524 430 432 433 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 741
Write 586
Mixed 621
SusWrite 461
135% 602 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 60.7
205% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 214
217% 370 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 141%
Great: 302%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
39GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 55 53 58 61 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 67.3
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 58.1
51% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
84GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 111 115 114 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 66
SusWrite 113
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 14GB
1800, 1800, 1800 MHz
8192, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback