Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 01:13
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 644
70% 557 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3668 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 102
Parallax 102
90% 105 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 85.7
83% 105 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.6.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 65 65 51 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 252
Write 127
Mixed 157
SusWrite 65.6
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 29.7
107% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72.4
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 88.5
67% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 80%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
60GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 550 559 444 350 369 381 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 735
Write 526
Mixed 595
SusWrite 442
129% 574 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 60.1
205% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 212
215% 369 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 140%
Great: 302%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
39GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 65 62 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 65.7
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 63.9
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
82GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 120 113 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 118
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 14GB
1632, 1632, 1632 MHz
8192, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback