Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '20 at 20:15
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 197 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 499 50% 407 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 47 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 47.3 38% 49.7 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 47.1 Splatting 66.4 50% 60.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 331 341 338 342 236 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 397 Write 380 Mixed 259 SusWrite 318 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 34.4 120% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 310 236% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 104%
THNSF8400CCSE 400GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 92GB free Firmware: DAC9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 337 342 339 341 370 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Read 300 Write 418 Mixed 350 SusWrite 343 80% 353 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 32 118% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 270 211% 294 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 140GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 97 99 100 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 66 SusWrite 98 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 59%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: A5DEKV35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 141 140 148 144 140 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 186 Mixed 75 SusWrite 143 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.7 193% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: A5DEKV35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 187 191 197 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 178 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 192 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 197% 2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 204GB free Firmware: ZZ100-15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 69 70 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 68 Write 65.5 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 69.1 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GB 2,884 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.1% Good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 22.2 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.5 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	766x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	198x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	116x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	88x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16