Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	3 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '20 at 10:01
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 84.6 45% 68.1 Pts	4-Core 84.1 8-Core 83.9 11% 84 Pts	64-Core 84.3 5% 84.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 18.6 16% 17.8 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.7 16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB 7,201 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 48 67 73 70 70 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.5% Below average	Read 136 Write 155 Mixed 139 SusWrite 60.8 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 21.4 70% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 20 DQ Write 43.8 DQ Mixed 32.2 24% 32 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 107%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 467GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 56 68 73 70 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 72 Write 66.3 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 63.9 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 62%
Generic USB CF Reader 4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 6377 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 14 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 14.3 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 14.4 16% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:04 CD F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ ID:04 CD F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ ID:83 0B NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 42GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $100Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	30x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $69Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16