Medion Erazer X7847 MD60315

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMedion Erazer X7847 MD60315  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RP6-M
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 01:35
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 178
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 341
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6B01) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.87
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 5.03
4% 26.7 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 11.5
7% 7.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsn51t02duk NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 280 147 111 86 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 765
Write 663
Mixed 745
SusWrite 206
133% 594 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 52.6
183% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 800
599% 801 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 173%
Liteonit LMT-128M6M mSATA 128GB
82GB free
Firmware: DM7110F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 265 267 261 267 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 380
Write 257
Mixed 229
SusWrite 266
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 23.7
93% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 180
162% 247 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
79GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 46
Write 46.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 49.7
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 25.2
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback