Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 92.3 64% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 96.7 8-Core 144 15% 120 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile Max-Q) 10,407 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Dell(1028 087C) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 23.7 16% 25.5 fps	MRender 35.5 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 18.7 20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thnsn51t02duk NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB 2,332 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 522GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 298 332 223 291 334 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 640 Write 362 Mixed 568 SusWrite 308 105% 470 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 27.7 102% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 70.8 DQ Mixed 240 147% 164 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 173%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 2,761 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 102GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 46 36 38 38 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 120 Write 76.2 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 44.5 98% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.6 145% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 35%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.2 2 2.4 2.4 2.9 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 3.7 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 2 11% 9.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 55% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GB 4,851 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 17.3 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.1 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,893x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 25%, 10,407 samples	1,591x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	57x

SSD
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	531x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	465x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	463x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 18,486 samples	772x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	492x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 11,016 samples	388x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16