Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '20 at 21:26
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 226
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 501
67% 499 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.77
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 8
6% 9.06 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 15.3
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3950 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 117
Parallax 121
99% 120 fps
MRender 151
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.3
90% 114 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 443 417 220 72 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 459
Mixed 405
SusWrite 279
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 43.7
151% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 221
202% 309 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 121%
Mknssdrw 240GB 240GB
23GB free
Firmware: S040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 235 224 143 61 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.4% Good
Read 339
Write 280
Mixed 288
SusWrite 155
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 28.2
120% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 0.5
45% 106 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
945GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 169 172 172 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 145
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 170
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
419GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 129 134 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 163
Write 169
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 134
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback