Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 412
57% 422 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 21.8
14% 18.9 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 21.3
15% 17.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 477
Write 283
Mixed 87.1
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 36.5
117% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 190
165% 242 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 199 197 198 198 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 194
Mixed 84
SusWrite 198
124% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 116%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 29.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback