Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180920
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 08:13
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,080
101% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.9% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 114
Parallax 127
96% 119 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 113
Splatting 92.5
96% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt ASM105x 240GB
151GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 291 302 299 301 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 330
Write 310
Mixed 243
SusWrite 288
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 21.5
75% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 56.2
68% 117 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1678 1493 1500 1505 1504 1224 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,540
Write 2,237
Mixed 1,750
SusWrite 1,484
449% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 74
245% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,503
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 1,130
861% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 322%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
61GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 337 331 319 316 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 466
Mixed 460
SusWrite 316
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 53.1
177% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Corsair Force LS SSD 500GB
273GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 401 468 469 466 389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 480
Mixed 431
SusWrite 412
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 55.1
189% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,087
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback