Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 19:08
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 131
2-Core 241
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 614
65% 520 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.6% Below average
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 106
11% 45 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 91.1
Splatting 91
87% 109 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 504 501 484 466 436 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1600
Write 1,925
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 522
303% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 67.7
223% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 933
738% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 214%
Great: 228%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
195GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 417 425 424 359 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 277
Write 316
Mixed 155
SusWrite 414
66% 290 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 26.5
86% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 108
82% 110 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 87%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
114GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 9.6 12 12 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 26
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 12.1
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 72%
WDC WD50 00LUCT-62C26Y0 500GB
223GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 16 12 11 10 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 31.5
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 12.4
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
107GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 60 38 37 38 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 147
Write 61.1
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 46.3
96% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.2
237% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB
31GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 26.3
37% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 32%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 268GB
249GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.9 5 4.6 5.2 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2.2
Write 1
SusWrite 4.5
3% 2.57 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
54GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.4 5.8 4.7 5.7 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 1.8
Mixed 14
SusWrite 5.6
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.4
99% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25.6
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback