Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '20 at 02:08
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 93.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 251 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 782 75% 616 Pts	64-Core 1,022 63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.3% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 109 Parallax 111 83% 107 fps	MRender 143 Gravity 95.2 Splatting 90.6 87% 110 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 430 450 436 463 472 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	199% Outstanding	Read 1,600 Write 1,878 Mixed 1,314 SusWrite 457 294% 1,312 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 62.6 211% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,237 DQ Write 624 DQ Mixed 293 387% 718 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 228%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 260GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 429 433 434 431 298 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 440 Write 393 Mixed 243 SusWrite 390 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 26.6 87% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 104 81% 110 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 87%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB 684 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 115GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 28 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 34 Write 28.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 28.5 23% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 72%
WDC WD50 00LUCT-62C26Y0 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 223GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 33.2 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 39.8 46% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 108GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 63 36 38 31 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 128 Write 45.7 Mixed 81 SusWrite 43.5 90% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 2.8 204% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 40%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 54GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.2 5.6 5.7 5.3 6.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.92% Terrible	Read 22.3 Write 4 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 5.8 10% 9.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 108% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.92% Great: 18%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 268GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 249GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.9 3.3 5.2 5.7 5.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 0.5 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 3.9 3% 1.73 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	78% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 22 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 24.9 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,077x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,075x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	474x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,457x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	602x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	401x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	826x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	288x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,771x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	292x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16