Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120521
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 19 '15 at 04:19
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 116
40% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 415
38% 320 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5012
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 66
Parallax 55.8
46% 59.3 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 52.6
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 64.2
Write 35.6
Mixed 51.7
38% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.14
35% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 77%
Verbatim Store 'n' Go 2GB
1GB free, PID 1e23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 5.81
Mixed 3.11
9% 8.71 MB/s
4K Read 2.77
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
12% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 6%
Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback