PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160427 |
Uptime | 13.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 10 '20 at 21:13 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 369 278 253 241 238 MB/s
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Adaptec Array 1.5TB
285GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
151GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
|
20%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
31.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 570x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 210x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 74x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $440 |