ADD TO PC
BUILD

Chuwi AeroBook Plus

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Chuwi AeroBook Plus (all builds)
Motherboard	CHUWI AeroBook Plus
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '20 at 21:33
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6287U 99 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 198 66% 121 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 218 22% 179 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 550 819 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7637 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	9.13% Terrible	Lighting 9.43 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 8.66 8% 6.72 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 17.4 12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.13% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Morebeck-n100 256GB 256GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 229 273 234 130 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 415 Write 280 Mixed 297 SusWrite 195 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 15.8 85% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 29.6 70% 139 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 64%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 931GB free Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 806 814 771 818 824 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 852 Write 780 Mixed 746 SusWrite 765 177% 786 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 46.1 187% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,036 DQ Write 846 DQ Mixed 830 652% 904 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 276%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 11 11 11 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 7.8 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 10.1 15% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB 26,973 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.6% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 39.8 MC Mixed 15.8 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical AeroBook Plus Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Chuwi AeroBook Plus

CPU
Core i5-6287UIntelBench 57%, 99 samples	13x
Core i7-6660UIntelBench 53%, 272 samples	1x

GPU
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	13x
Iris Graphics 540IntelBench 7%, 6,448 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 68%, 456 samples	6x
ssd 512GBBench 73%, 4,609 samples	1x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	1x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	12x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 72%, 83 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback