Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '17 at 10:57
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 164 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 519 52% 425 Pts	64-Core 523 32% 523 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1829 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (42 fps cap detected)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 34.9 Parallax 41.3 35% 39.8 fps	MRender 41.7 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 40 33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 128GB-$93 664 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1811 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1067 (B1) Unknown 100 100 676599 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 135 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 446604 (F2) Unknown 100 100 377585	81.1% Excellent	Read 675 Write 332 Mixed 438 106% 481 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 20 107% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 19.9 24% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 180GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 130 130 25788416300 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 483 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 126 126 32 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12111 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 881 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 881 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 171800199202 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.2% Very good	Read 128 Write 134 Mixed 115 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.19 93% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 108%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 56GB free Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 198457432 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7453 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 17296452579 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 31334 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3658 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 522059807 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 90194313247 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 39 14 198457432 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -32031866052451 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1878849212 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3676701562	52.3% Above average	Read 87.9 Write 94.3 Mixed 79.3 65% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.25 85% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 55GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 234 1200 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4186 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31569 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3632 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 846 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4183 (C2) HDA temperature 117 101 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.2% Average	Read 76.3 Write 77.3 Mixed 65.4 55% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.28 90% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 24GB free Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 94 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896960696 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2002 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18698 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1777 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2039 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2044 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 180390002719 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 102 Write 97.7 Mixed 85.5 71% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.19 76% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 103%
WD My Passport 0830 500GB 1,616 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 147GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 35 Write 29.1 Mixed 29.5 39% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.25 67% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 45%
HGST TOURO S 1TB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 72GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 93.7 Write 76.8 Mixed 88.5 109% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.16 53% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1866C9-8GSR F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1866C9-8GSR 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.5% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 17.6 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	864x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16