Asus Z87-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-K  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 01:13
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$127
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 413
53% 401 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.4% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 45.6
44% 52 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 57
Splatting 53.7
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 322 267 274 272 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 371
Write 405
Mixed 331
SusWrite 297
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.9
188% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 257
221% 325 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
707GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 115 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 115
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
346GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 131 132 134 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 144
Write 149
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 132
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 108%
WD My Passport 0741 1TB
578GB free, PID 0741
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 19 11 1.1 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 37
Write 37.3
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 10.7
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 0830 500GB
419GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 27.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 1.6
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-K Builds (Compare 2,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Z87-K - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $477
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback