Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '19 at 01:46
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 159 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 488 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.1% Poor	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 38.9 33% 37.1 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 0.13 19% 26.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 128GB-$93 664 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 340 318 297 320 341 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 624 Write 344 Mixed 293 SusWrite 321 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 31 110% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 86 DQ Mixed 106 88% 130 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 82GB free Firmware: MS1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 135 134 134 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 102 Write 105 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 134 67% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 103%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 29GB free Firmware: CC3E SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 56 58 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 52 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 56.3 43% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 5GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 71 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 71.2 Write 71 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 70.6 50% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 15GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 148 Write 155 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 113 79% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 108%
HGST TOURO S 1TB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 39GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 72 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	31% Below average	Read 76 Write 78.3 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 72.4 83% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 51%
WD My Passport 0830 500GB 1,616 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 44GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 61 59 60 60 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 59.8 Write 61.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 60.1 70% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1866C9-8GSR F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1866C9-8GSR 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 17.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 12.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	864x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16