Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 16:09
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,023
97% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,428
88% 1,428 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 195
Parallax 178
147% 185 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 181
Splatting 123
115% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 844 521 521 518 524 519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,754
Write 1,324
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 574
340% 1,541 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 95.7
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,403
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 533
609% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 304%
Great: 318%
Crucial MTFDDAK2T0TBN-1AR1ZABHA 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPC0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 471 341 279 274 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 338
Write 488
Mixed 373
SusWrite 354
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 289
230% 320 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 95%
Toshiba HDWN160 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: FS1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 204 199 198 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 112%
Seagate ST8000VX0002-1Z6 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 204 208 207 208 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 143 142 141 145 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 76.6
Write 129
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 145
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 90%
WD WD80PUZX-64NEAY0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 155 161 174 177 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 190
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 171
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
229% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 99%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 107 107 109 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 82
SusWrite 105
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 36
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 37
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback