Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 16:41
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,028
94% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 197
Parallax 197
152% 194 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 184
Splatting 127
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 520 522 522 522 524 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,757
Write 1,264
Mixed 1,523
SusWrite 520
334% 1,516 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 94.1
320% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 1,138
DQ Mixed 578
617% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 297%
Great: 318%
Crucial MTFDDAK2T0TBN-1AR1ZABHA 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPC0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 469 300 280 265 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 362
Write 264
Mixed 170
SusWrite 346
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 26.1
111% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 298
226% 303 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 95%
Toshiba HDWN160 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: FS1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 201 199 196 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 187
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 199
118% 163 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
388% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST8000VX0002-1Z6 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 206 207 208 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 142 140 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 84.2
Write 118
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 134
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 90%
WD WD80PUZX-64NEAY0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 154 161 174 175 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 191
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 171
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
238% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 99%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 88 94 90 114 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 119
Write 108
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 101
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 36.6
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 38.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback