Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 20:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 960
93% 765 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.8% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 96.7
84% 99.3 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 70
69% 87.3 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 32 53 104 113 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 410
Write 350
Mixed 270
SusWrite 111
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 11.9
52% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 43.9
49% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 217 220 218 219 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 110
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 218
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-4GVK 04CB 04CD F4-3200C16-4GVK 04CB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 17
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback