Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E7440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RYCC9
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140218
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 07:50
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 146
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 212
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 6.03
3% 5.31 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.57
5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4AD0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 104 99 98 106 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 391
Write 124
Mixed 142
SusWrite 106
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 15.3
56% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 57.7
90% 177 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 17.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback