HP ProBook 430 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 430 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1946
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 04:53
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 63
2-Core 103
50% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 144
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1946) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 5.03
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P3L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 80 85 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 92
Write 94.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 86.3
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 60%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
13GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 14.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 12.1
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 430 G1 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback