PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X9DR3-F (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DR3-F |
Memory | 26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150709 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 04 '20 at 01:48 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
71.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 285 273 270 274 274 MB/s
|
67.5%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
124GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 447 445 446 450 450 MB/s
|
98.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 97 118 113 97 99 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9965439-092.A 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78.4%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 6x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |