Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 20:47
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 353
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 31.2
22% 33.8 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 31.7
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MMCRE28G5MXP-MVB 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM19C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 0 0 8.1 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 3% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
837GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 107 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 106
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%
Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB
205GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 64.4
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 58.3
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.1
145% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 39%
54GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 7.5 8.2 8.1 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 2.8
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 7.4
10% 8.08 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 30%
LW UDisk 4GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.2 5.1 4.7 4.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 4.8
6% 6.45 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX CT51264BA160B.C16F Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback