Intel NUC8BEB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i5BEH
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime15 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 20:49
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 194
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 579
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6287
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 11.6
0% 7.68 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 16.9
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 498 482 425 288 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 109 107 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 99.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 108
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 68%
LW UDisk 4GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.7 5.9 5.9 4.9 5.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Read 16
Write 4.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.6
8% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 10.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 12.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8BEB Builds (Compare 1,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback