Acer Aspire X3910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire X3910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WG43M
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100324
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 09:24
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 65.8
38% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 69.4
8-Core 69.4
9% 69.4 Pts
64-Core 64.7
4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.16
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 69 39 47 78 7.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 198
Write 97.3
Mixed 128
SusWrite 53.9
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 17
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 125
100% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
131GB free
Firmware: 1AG01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 82.3
Write 38.3
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 76.7
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston Kingston 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3910 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback