Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 05:16
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 147
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 339
38% 296 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 71.6
56% 71.5 fps
MRender 75.5
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 58.7
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
69GB free
Firmware: C675
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 289 311 313 203 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 432
Write 389
Mixed 309
SusWrite 276
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 27.1
90% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 16.5
62% 137 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
32GB free
Firmware: C675
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 288 353 327 313 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 429
Write 387
Mixed 314
SusWrite 327
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 25.6
89% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 19.8
61% 133 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 171 135 150 174 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 116
Write 78.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 150
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.6
442% 3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.5
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 101
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 67%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 9.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9.5
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3RPR16002G 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback