Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '17 at 10:56
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 103
53% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 202
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 20.3
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 360
Write 143
Mixed 164
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 4.78
95% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 23
59% 127 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
426GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 82
Write 84.7
Mixed 34.9
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.31
84% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
165GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 61.9
Write 41.6
Mixed 49.8
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.39
93% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
96GB free
Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 86.8
Write 94.9
Mixed 79
65% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.35
82% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3RPR16002G 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback