Asus H61M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H61M-E  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 12:45
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 512
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 110
Parallax 103
82% 105 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 97.8
79% 96.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N500 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 16 36 37 42 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 255
Write 204
Mixed 8
SusWrite 42.9
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 1.1
42% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 34.6
35% 59 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 60%
WD WD7502ABYS-02A6B0 750GB
79GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 81
SusWrite 78.2
70% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-E Builds (Compare 1,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-E - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback