Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 08:57
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 229
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 863
78% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,247
77% 1,247 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 43.4
36% 40.2 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 37.8
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 7 511GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 478 432 448 461 462 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 3,422
Write 2,125
Mixed 1,426
SusWrite 496
412% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 48.4
158% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 491
416% 600 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 245%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid XPG SPECTRIX S40 256GB
180GB free
Firmware: VB41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1064 635 1119 931 132 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1,119
Mixed 996
SusWrite 666
227% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 43.2
138% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 320
269% 376 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 153%
Great: 180%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
182GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.2 5 4.6 3.5 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 5
SusWrite 4.8
6% 8.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid HDS722020ALA330 2TB
57GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 52 53 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 51.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 52.4
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 50%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
264GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 115 112 118 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 124
Write 129
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 116
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
379GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 101 106 110 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 86.6
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 104
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
24GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 108 96 97 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 80.4
Write 42.8
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 89.2
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 DDR4 2666 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 31.8
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 28.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback