Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 01:58
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 752
73% 601 Pts
64-Core 1,256
78% 1,256 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 39
37% 39 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 38
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 7 511GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,446
Write 2,120
Mixed 1,387
440% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 48.5
161% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 583
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 492
415% 596 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 236%
Amd-raid XPG SPECTRIX S40 256GB
180GB free
Firmware: VB41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,122
Write 1,109
Mixed 984
239% 1,072 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 43.9
144% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 320
271% 381 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 180%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
182GB free
Firmware: CC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.5
Write 11
Mixed 12.7
13% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 72%
Amd-raid HDS722020ALA330 2TB
57GB free
Firmware: JKAO
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74.4
Write 58
Mixed 35.9
42% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 50%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
264GB free
Firmware: MK7O
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 57.9
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 77%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
394GB free
Firmware: MK7O
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.2
Write 94.2
Mixed 57.2
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
34GB free
Firmware: CC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.8
Write 14.2
Mixed 15.5
23% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 DDR4 2666 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 31.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 28.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback