PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '20 at 19:16 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1805 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD1200SD-01KCB0 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 8.8 11 40 35 MB/s
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
|||
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
19GB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 48 47 49 49 MB/s
|
30%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: FJK3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 114 120 120 MB/s
|
68%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
109GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 48 49 50 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
2GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 511x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 326x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 186x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 91x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $171 |