TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star GE73 Raider RGB 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 16:35
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 216
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 562
63% 494 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 84%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1215) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 60.1
56% 67.5 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 65.8
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 55.2%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 321 323 322 321 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,561
Write 1,136
Mixed 664
SusWrite 347
205% 927 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 62.8
201% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,173
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 907
715% 996 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑
This bench: 193%
 Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
677GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 121 118 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 119
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 121
71% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 72.2%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 72%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples1,449x
Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples3x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples656x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples461x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples333x
SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples229x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GBWDCBench 139%, 2,393 samples119x
RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,961 samples54x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples309x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples89x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples87x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback